Skip to main content

16 years to 10000 hours


One of my favourite books in recent years was Malcolm Gladwell’s Outliers: The Story of Success (2008). The main reason I liked the book is that unlike the stereotypical self-developing style title, it does not try to teach the readers how to become successful. On the contrary most of stories in the book are the product of observation that is processed in the author’s analytical mind about how the successful became successful. The funny thing is that you would find out more about why you are not so successful than how to be successful.

Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell with others on my bookshelf.

Anyway in the book Gladwell repeatedly mentions the “10,000-Hour Rule” - the idea that it takes approximately 10,000 hours of deliberate practice to master a skill.

After I read this book I developed a new habit of counting hours of things that I do/did in order to measure the current skill level. So now you can see where I am heading with this.

I work full time during the week days like any other. Some street photographers I know  often take their camera while commuting to shoot, but that’s not really an option for me and most of time after work I can’t really go out for shooting.

Type of photo I take at home on week days.

In the end I can only dedicate my time for photography on weekend. Even that option has to pay the price of coordinating with my wife so that I can still provide quality (not quantity) time together while indulging myself with camera. As a man if you lose you win, you know?

Quality time strategy - Use your wife as a model !

So only 52 weeks in a year I have. Let’s say every weekend I go out on one of Sat or Sun. Each time I do spend 3-4 hours of searching and shooting on the street then it will give me roughly 182 hours a year.

After each photo shoot session I roughly spend 1-2 hours of post processing. As a hobbyist photographer I haven’t really developed “a style” yet (of course, duh!) So I tend to try many different techniques of post processing.

Before
Furthermore I am a type of person who thinks the post processing really brings a new life to the photo. As soon as you get JPEG from your digital camera, it's already processed. Why can't I process it myself from RAW format as the way I want? To me post processing is like packaging my present with different papers and it does take some time.

After
Hence I have extra 78 hours a year that will sum up to 260 hours per year. In this rate it will take 38 years to reach 10,000 hours. Oh my goodness.

I need to squeeze my brain to find more hours just to be sane as I wish to be a master level before I am 71-year old. Having said that I realized not only the actual shooting improves my photography skill. Reading and seeing other people’s (great) works definitely have been helping me to improve so they need to be counted.

A bit of drama to find his photo book. Maybe next time.

“You must know what’s really good in order to know what’s really bad” - Scott Kim

Yes, the quote is from me, not from Garry :)

Considering the amount of photo related blogs, YouTube channels and other sources, I am confident to say I do spend about an hour per day on photography that gives another 365 hours a year and by adding all them up, my magic number is 10000 / 625 = 16 years.

Another work from the greatest.
Photo by Garry Winogrand from The Game of Photography

With the passion I have and the dedication I would need a lot, by the age of 49 I can be a master of photography! :)

It’s funny to think in this way but at least this gives me a clear idea that how difficult it is to be really good at something. How much effort you need to spend and the dedication you need to push your wheel. I really do think that the photography has become a pleasant page of my life and wish to continue to do it this way. While following my own joy if mastership comes as a prize at the age of 49, then I would call it a bargain.

Keep Shooting Scott!

All the images were published under the "Creative Commons" licence.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What I Talk About When I Talk About Gears - Ricoh GR

I love camera gears. I like to read about them and learn about them and discuss them. I'm subscribed to various camera review channels on YouTube, my news feeds never miss the latest trend in the camera world, and I have more than one friends on Facebook who never get bored of posting the camera news. So, as you can see, I spend enough time musing on the gear.

Meanwhile, as much as I like them, I try hard to avoid them as it took me a couple of years to realise that the type of camera I use has the least amount of contribution to the quality of the photo.

Even worse, I (personally) do believe that spending more time of gear has an adverse impact on developing photographic skills of my own. So, there I said it. Considering what I stated above, I'm definitely contradicting myself when it comes down to camera gear.

The funny thing though is that the primary motivation behind starting this blog was the new gear I fell in love with at that time, which I still do - Fujifilm X100.…

Yashica Electro 35 GSN

So I have done it again. Although I've tried hard to avoid putting myself into buying another gear, I still ended up with this, Yashica Electro GSN35, "poor man's Leica". For the record, I didn't buy it because I saw how cool it looks with Andrew Garfield.

source: cameras in media
Yes :) A little trivia here, the camera that Tobey Maguire was using in Spider-Man (2002) was Canon F-1 SLR, 1981 model, while Andrew Garfield was using Yashica Electro GSN35 in the last Spider-Man (2012) movie. I asked my wife whether she can take a photo of me using this camera like the above and she said it's not possible ...

The camera felt much heavier than I expected at first. It has a robust and rugged feeling to it which I ended up liking although I'm not a fan of carrying a heavy camera, it's just something you have to live with. It only operates in AV mode with the exposure level indicated by the two arrows displayed in the viewfinder. Turn the aperture ring to the…

Post Processing

Although I enjoy photography as an escape from the daily grind, I can't fully distance myself from being a photographic geek when it comes to cameras and gears. I have subscribed numerous camera review channels on YouTube and can spend hours reading/watching about various old and new cameras. Especially, most of the brand new digital cameras, they tend to show off their amazing new sensor, super fast shutter speed, and high ISO capabilities resulting in amazing low light performances ... then, I start to scratch my head thinking that post-processing I do nowadays is done to degrade the quality of photo to have a so-called 'vintage film look'.

The Funny thing is that I still love working with RAW files to start with, and the first processing I do is always de-noising an image. Even when I'm almost certainly sure that I'm heading for a coarsely grained result, somehow I like to start with a picture with least amount of noise. It's just like preparing a white canv…