Skip to main content

Graffiti, Racism, Newtown

Walking down the back streets and alleys in Newtown is like going through the hallway of modern art museum. Corner to corner you can find fine pieces of graffitis, paintings and various form of art work. Graffiti is strictly illegal as far as I know, but the people here learnt how to live with them and treat it a part of the street, or maybe they just had no other choice.

The local council seems to manage the street signs and public buildings well, but they implicitly allow it in the certain part of the streets and let the artists enjoy the free canvas. It's still a fine line between being an art and stupid vandalism,  but here it's the transformation of mundane objects into arts.


Penis to her eye? I found this be very childish but creative in some way.




Watch out your corners.


Flying high? Birds entrapped on the wall.








Me.





One interesting place I visited on the day was the home of Newtown artist, Sergio Redegalli. I got to know his story from TV show 'Dumb, Drunk and Racist' by ABC. Funny documentary about four Indian people visiting Australia with the pre-conception of Australians being dumb, drunk and racist. (See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRqOFW9j0rI). The last part of the episode one was the confrontation with Sergio himself.

He previously has made some local news headlines with his controversial mural with the slogan 'Say No To Burqas'. He believes that he is just practising his right of freedom of speech and if certain people react offensively to his message, then the society already has a problem which needs to be revealed. Then, when one of the four Indian people asked why do you ignite the fire with his slogan, he said what he is doing is like a controlled fire.

In my humble opinion, he is just a dumb, opinionated racist with false logic in his mind. When he does it, it's a controlled fire and when others do, racism? In one scene,

Host: "If a muslim woman doesn't want you to see her face, isn't that her business? Why should you have a right to say show her face if she doesn't want to?"

Sergio: "No sorry, I don't believe in minority rules"

It pretty summarises how messed up his mind is and what he thinks right is total bullshit.



Anyway on the day of shooting, I visited the wall myself and he apparently has changed his slogan. His attention has been moved from burqas to female genital mutilation. Probably clever move to make and less vandalism on his wall.


The other side of the wall, another mural of his 'Free Speech *CONDITIONS APPLY'. I would like to quote the passage from Five fundamental freedoms page in Australian Immigration website.
Freedom of speech 
Australians are free, within the bounds of the law, to say or write what we think privately or publicly, about the government, or about any topic. We do not censor the media and may criticise the government without fear of arrest. Free speech comes from facts, not rumours, and the intention must be constructive, not to do harm. There are laws to protect a person's good name and integrity against false information. There are laws against saying or writing things to incite hatred against others because of their culture, ethnicity or background. Freedom of speech is not an excuse to harm others.
Even with my poor second language English skill, I can understand the essence of the idea. Mr. Sergio said his message is not harmful as his wording only includes 'No To Burqas', not 'ban' or 'fuck'. With his right of freedom of speech, he lives in the house of this high walls with several surveillance cameras. Good to be free.


All the images were taken with X100.

Thanks for visiting.


UPDATES: 09/AUG/2012 Some feedback from Sergio himself.


All the images were published under the "Creative Commons" licence.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What I Talk About When I Talk About Gears - Ricoh GR

I love camera gears. I like to read about them and learn about them and discuss them. I'm subscribed to various camera review channels on YouTube, my news feeds never miss the latest trend in the camera world, and I have more than one friends on Facebook who never get bored of posting the camera news. So, as you can see, I spend enough time musing on the gear.

Meanwhile, as much as I like them, I try hard to avoid them as it took me a couple of years to realise that the type of camera I use has the least amount of contribution to the quality of the photo.

Even worse, I (personally) do believe that spending more time of gear has an adverse impact on developing photographic skills of my own. So, there I said it. Considering what I stated above, I'm definitely contradicting myself when it comes down to camera gear.

The funny thing though is that the primary motivation behind starting this blog was the new gear I fell in love with at that time, which I still do - Fujifilm X100.…

Yashica Electro 35 GSN

So I have done it again. Although I've tried hard to avoid putting myself into buying another gear, I still ended up with this, Yashica Electro GSN35, "poor man's Leica". For the record, I didn't buy it because I saw how cool it looks with Andrew Garfield.

source: cameras in media
Yes :) A little trivia here, the camera that Tobey Maguire was using in Spider-Man (2002) was Canon F-1 SLR, 1981 model, while Andrew Garfield was using Yashica Electro GSN35 in the last Spider-Man (2012) movie. I asked my wife whether she can take a photo of me using this camera like the above and she said it's not possible ...

The camera felt much heavier than I expected at first. It has a robust and rugged feeling to it which I ended up liking although I'm not a fan of carrying a heavy camera, it's just something you have to live with. It only operates in AV mode with the exposure level indicated by the two arrows displayed in the viewfinder. Turn the aperture ring to the…

Post Processing

Although I enjoy photography as an escape from the daily grind, I can't fully distance myself from being a photographic geek when it comes to cameras and gears. I have subscribed numerous camera review channels on YouTube and can spend hours reading/watching about various old and new cameras. Especially, most of the brand new digital cameras, they tend to show off their amazing new sensor, super fast shutter speed, and high ISO capabilities resulting in amazing low light performances ... then, I start to scratch my head thinking that post-processing I do nowadays is done to degrade the quality of photo to have a so-called 'vintage film look'.

The Funny thing is that I still love working with RAW files to start with, and the first processing I do is always de-noising an image. Even when I'm almost certainly sure that I'm heading for a coarsely grained result, somehow I like to start with a picture with least amount of noise. It's just like preparing a white canv…